Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!
Theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* Rewrite rule: α→β, where {α, β} are strings of terminals and non-terminals | * Rewrite rule: α→β, where {α, β} are strings of terminals and non-terminals | ||
* Recognized <i>but not decided</i> by [[Turing Machines]] (ie, any 'yes' answer can be verified, but 'no' cases might not halt) | * Recognized <i>but not decided</i> by [[Turing Machines]] (ie, any 'yes' answer can be verified, but 'no' cases might not halt) | ||
==Closures== | |||
{|class="wikitable borders" | |||
! class !! concat !! union !! intersection !! kleene !! setdiff !! complement | |||
|- | |||
| REG || Y || Y || Y || Y || Y || Y | |||
|- | |||
| CFL || Y || Y || n || Y || n || n | |||
|- | |||
| R || Y || Y || Y || Y || Y || Y | |||
|- | |||
| RE || Y || Y || Y || Y || n || n | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
[[Category: CS GRE Prep]] | [[Category: CS GRE Prep]] |
Latest revision as of 11:26, 12 March 2025
Formal Languages
Regular Languages (Class REG)
- Type 3 of the Chomsky Hierarchy
- Rewrite rules: A→a and A→aB, where {A, B} are non-terminals, and a is a terminal
- Nondeterminism (NFAs) adds no power to finite state automata (DFAs).
- Recognized by finite state machines. Equivalent to DSPACE(1).
- Closed under union, concatenation, Kleene, intersection, difference, complement, reverse, right-quotient, homomorphism, derivation
- Derivation with respect to L and a: all the strings in L starting with 'a' have it removed
- Pumping lemma: A language L is regular if and only if there exists a positive integer m such that for any w ∈ L with |w| ≥ m there exist strings x, y and z such that:
- w = xyz,
- |xy| ≤ m,
- |y| ≥ 1, and
- xyiz ∈ L for all i ≥ 0
Context-Free Languages (CFLs) / Grammars (CFGs)
- Type 2 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, and a proper superset of RLs
- Rewrite rule: A→γ, where A is a non-terminal, and γ is a string of terminals and non-terminals
- Recognized by nondeterministic pushdown automata (NPDAs)
- Deterministic pushdown automata (DPDAs) cannot recognize all CFLs (only the DCFLs)!
- Closed under union, concatenation, Kleene, reverse
- Not closed under complement or difference
- The intersection of an RL and CFL is a CFL, but CFLs are not closed under intersection
- Universality, language equality, language inclusion, and regularity are all undecidable given arbitrary input CFLs
Efficiently-Parsed CFLs (using n tokens of lookahead)
- LL(n) (Lewis and Stearns, 1968):
- Language equality is decidable for the simple grammars, a subset of LL(1)
- LR(n) (Knuth, 1965):
- LALR(n):
Context-Sensitive Languages
- Type 1 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, and a proper superset of CFLs
- Rewrite rule: αAβ→αγβ, where A is a non-terminal, and {α, β, γ} are strings of terminals and non-terminals
- Recognized by linear bounded automata
Recursive Languages (Class R)
- Decided by Turing Machines
Recursively-Enumerable Languages (Class RE)
- Type 0 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, and a proper superset of CSLs
- Rewrite rule: α→β, where {α, β} are strings of terminals and non-terminals
- Recognized but not decided by Turing Machines (ie, any 'yes' answer can be verified, but 'no' cases might not halt)
Closures
class | concat | union | intersection | kleene | setdiff | complement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
CFL | Y | Y | n | Y | n | n |
R | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
RE | Y | Y | Y | Y | n | n |