Electronics: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:20, 9 January 2025 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,305 edits →Particle physics ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:00, 10 January 2025 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,305 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I find the study of electronics to be somewhat frustrating. Maybe things ~~would~~ have been different if I'd been CmpE or EE, but I ~~could find~~ no real axiomatic treatment of the material. You've got QED (largely irrelevant save to confuse), and classical emag (magnets end up being rather less important than thought), and circuit laws (lots of these), and rules of thumb, and there's no great taxonomy of components, and the people on the forums are mostly braindead. So I'm taking notes here.		I find the study of electronics to be somewhat frustrating. Maybe things might have been different if I'd been CmpE or EE, but I've found no real axiomatic treatment of the material. You've got QED (largely irrelevant save to confuse), and classical emag (magnets end up being rather less important than thought), and circuit laws (lots of these), and rules of thumb, and there's no great taxonomy of components, and the people on the forums are mostly braindead. So I'm taking notes here.

	==Charge==		==Charge==