Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!
Theory: Difference between revisions
From dankwiki
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** |''y''| ≥ 1, and | ** |''y''| ≥ 1, and | ||
** ''xy<sup>i</sup>z'' ∈ '''L''' for all ''i'' ≥ 0 | ** ''xy<sup>i</sup>z'' ∈ '''L''' for all ''i'' ≥ 0 | ||
* Nondeterminism (NFAs) adds no power to finite state automata (DFAs). | |||
===Context-Free Languages (CFLs) / Grammars (CFGs)=== | ===Context-Free Languages (CFLs) / Grammars (CFGs)=== |
Revision as of 22:50, 9 October 2009
Formal Languages
Regular Languages (Class REG)
- Type 3 of the Chomsky Hierarchy (rewrite rules: A→a and A→aB)
- Recognized by finite state machines. Equivalent to DSPACE(1).
- Closed under union, concatenation, Kleene, intersection, difference, complement, reverse, right-quotient, homomorphism
- Pumping lemma: A language L is regular if and only if there exists a positive integer m such that for any w ∈ L with |w| ≥ m there exist strings x, y and z such that:
- w = xyz,
- |xy| ≤ m,
- |y| ≥ 1, and
- xyiz ∈ L for all i ≥ 0
- Nondeterminism (NFAs) adds no power to finite state automata (DFAs).
Context-Free Languages (CFLs) / Grammars (CFGs)
- Type 2 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, a proper superset of RL's
- Recognized by nondeterministic pushdown automata
- Deterministic pushdown automata cannot recognize all CFL's!
- Closed under union, concatenation, Kleene, reverse
- Not closed under complement or difference
- The intersection of an RL and CFL is a CFL, but CFLs are not closed under intersection
Efficiently-Parsed CFLs
- LL(n) (Lewis and Stearns, 1968):
- LR(n) (Knuth, 1965):
Context-Sensitive Languages
- Type 1 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, a proper superset of CFL's
- Recognized by linear bounded automata
Recursively-Enumerable Languages (Class RE)
- Type 0 of the Chomsky Hierarchy, a proper superset of CSL's
- Recognized by Turing Machines (ie, any 'yes' answer can be verified, but 'no' cases might not halt)
Recursive Languages (Class R)
- Decided by Turing Machines