Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!

Schwarzgerät: Difference between revisions

From dankwiki
m (Dank moved page Vanity Fair: Justifying the Intel 6950X to Vanity Fair: the Intel 6950X without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
― John Bunyan, ''The Pilgrim's Progress'', Part I (1678)</blockquote>
― John Bunyan, ''The Pilgrim's Progress'', Part I (1678)</blockquote>


As I began researching recent years' incremental improvements to high-end desktop technologies, one thing seemed obvious: the Intel Broadwell-E Core i7 6950X was laughably useless, a processor distinguished only by its price, a money-grab strictly suitable for moneyed suckers. Broadly dismissed in reviews, its clock speed and microarchitecture are inferior to the ''much'' cheaper Skylake i7 6700K, its cost per core exceeds that of all but the largest Broadwell-EP Xeon E5 v4s, and it doesn't support multisocket configurations. Arstechnica [http://www.anandtech.com/show/10337/the-intel-broadwell-e-review-core-i7-6950x-6900k-6850k-and-6800k-tested-up-to-10-cores put it best] in their Broadwell-E review:
As I began researching recent years' incremental improvements to high-end desktop technologies, one thing seemed obvious: the Intel Broadwell-E Core i7 6950X was laughably useless, a processor distinguished only by its price, a money-grab narrowly targeted at suckers. Broadly dismissed in reviews, its clock speed and microarchitecture are inferior to the ''much'' cheaper Skylake i7 6700K, its cost per core exceeds that of all but the largest Broadwell-EP Xeon E5 v4s, and it doesn't support multisocket configurations. Arstechnica [http://www.anandtech.com/show/10337/the-intel-broadwell-e-review-core-i7-6950x-6900k-6850k-and-6800k-tested-up-to-10-cores put it best] in their Broadwell-E review:
<blockquote>Intel is somewhat shooting itself in the foot with the pricing on the i7-6950X. The recently released Xeon Broadwell-EP processor list includes the Xeon E5-2640 v4: a 10-core 2.4 GHz/3.4 GHz part that runs at 90W, and is priced at $939, which compares favorably to the i7-6950X and its 10-cores at a 3.0 GHz/3.5 GHz clockspeeds. And because it’s a Xeon E5 processor processor, with the right motherboard a user can put two into the same machine for 20 cores/40 threads for only $1878, or only $150 more than the 10-core i7-6950X.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Intel is somewhat shooting itself in the foot with the pricing on the i7-6950X. The recently released Xeon Broadwell-EP processor list includes the Xeon E5-2640 v4: a 10-core 2.4 GHz/3.4 GHz part that runs at 90W, and is priced at $939, which compares favorably to the i7-6950X and its 10-cores at a 3.0 GHz/3.5 GHz clockspeeds. And because it’s a Xeon E5 processor processor, with the right motherboard a user can put two into the same machine for 20 cores/40 threads for only $1878, or only $150 more than the 10-core i7-6950X.</blockquote>
I thus felt weird several days later buying a 6950X ($1650 at Amazon). This writeup seeks to justify my purchase, arguing that the black sheep Broadwell-E Extreme decacore is actually the best option for a very small class of users.
I thus felt weird several days later buying a 6950X ($1650 at Amazon). This writeup seeks to justify my purchase, arguing that the black sheep Broadwell-E Extreme decacore is actually the best option for a very small class of users.

Revision as of 00:33, 16 August 2016

Money has only a different value in the eyes of each. ― William Makepeace Thackeray, Vanity Fair, Chapter XLIV (1847)

In August of 2016, I finally pulled the trigger on a long-planned workstation build. That same month, Intel and NVIDIA dropped new product. Hot, salivation-provoking product: densely packed marvels bursting with FLOPS, rough dank beasts woven up from high-κ 16nm and 14nm strained-silicon FinFETs. Both companies, utterly dominant at their markets' high ends, announced pricing that effectively shoved atom bombs up the asses of computing enthusiast throughout the free world. This is the story of that build.

Intro: Who ordered this?

Their way to the City lay through this town of Vanity, they contrived here to set up a fair; a fair wherein should be sold of all sorts of vanity, and that it should last all the year long. Therefore at this fair are all such merchandise sold: as houses, lands, trades, places, honours, preferments, titles, countries, kingdoms; lusts, pleasures, and delights of all sorts – as whores, bawds, wives, husbands, children, masters, servants, lives, blood, bodies, souls, silver, gold, pearls, precious stones, and what not.

And moreover, at this fair there is at all times to be deceivers, cheats, games, plays, fools, apes, knaves, and rogues and that of every kind.

― John Bunyan, The Pilgrim's Progress, Part I (1678)

As I began researching recent years' incremental improvements to high-end desktop technologies, one thing seemed obvious: the Intel Broadwell-E Core i7 6950X was laughably useless, a processor distinguished only by its price, a money-grab narrowly targeted at suckers. Broadly dismissed in reviews, its clock speed and microarchitecture are inferior to the much cheaper Skylake i7 6700K, its cost per core exceeds that of all but the largest Broadwell-EP Xeon E5 v4s, and it doesn't support multisocket configurations. Arstechnica put it best in their Broadwell-E review:

Intel is somewhat shooting itself in the foot with the pricing on the i7-6950X. The recently released Xeon Broadwell-EP processor list includes the Xeon E5-2640 v4: a 10-core 2.4 GHz/3.4 GHz part that runs at 90W, and is priced at $939, which compares favorably to the i7-6950X and its 10-cores at a 3.0 GHz/3.5 GHz clockspeeds. And because it’s a Xeon E5 processor processor, with the right motherboard a user can put two into the same machine for 20 cores/40 threads for only $1878, or only $150 more than the 10-core i7-6950X.

I thus felt weird several days later buying a 6950X ($1650 at Amazon). This writeup seeks to justify my purchase, arguing that the black sheep Broadwell-E Extreme decacore is actually the best option for a very small class of users.

With that said, Intel and NVIDIA sure are fucking builders for all we're worth on premium components.

Build Goals

There is no way to tell his story without telling my own. And if his story really is a confession, then so is mine. ―Apocalypse Now (1979)

I am not a gamer. If you're building a gaming rig, go buy a Skylake 6700K and be done with it. Game performance is almost entirely based on on GPUs, games generally make poor use of extra cores, and the 6700K clocks higher. You'll get a better interface to the southbridge via DMI 3.0, you'll draw less power, and you'll save money sufficient to buy a video card.

My major compute tasks include:

  • Compilation of large source packages
  • Developing and testing my own software, some of it using GPGPU
  • Running large simulations and data analysis, some of it using GPGPU
  • Research into high-performance computing and networking
  • Occasional virtualization, console emulation, video editing and transcoding

In addition, I require several dozen terabytes of spinning disk, significant solid state storage, quality XLR audio output, and lots of USB/wireless connectivity. All non-volatile storage must employ redundancy.

The Case

I'd purchased a CaseLabs Magnum T10 in 2013 (the Magnum T10 has been discontinued; the linked Magnum TH10A is similar), and was determined to finally make fitting use of it. The T10 is an absolutely gorgeous, elegantly engineered, monster of a double-wide case, weighing in at 24 pounds of aluminum. At 15 inches wide, 25.06 inches tall, and 20.06 inches deep (381mm x 637mm x 510mm), it'll easily fit EATX/SSI-MEB/XL-ATX motherboards, dozens of hard drives, and the powerful radiators/fans necessary to quietly cool it all. With casters attached, it could transport a small child in comfort and style.