Kprobes

Line 1:

Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: kprobes can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while kretprobes are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API), implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program~~, or configured via debugfs or the [[perf]] tool~~.

Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: kprobes can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while kretprobes are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API, as done by SystemTap), manipulated via debugfs (as done by ftrace), configured using the [[perf]] tool, or implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program.

uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, explicitly specified by kernel authors using <tt>TRACE_EVENT</tt>; think of them as "opt-in", as opposed to dynamic kprobes, though there is a tracepoint for each system call.

Kprobes: Difference between revisions

Dank (talk | contribs)

Revision as of 05:53, 6 October 2019 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,302 edits →Working with kprobes ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:15, 6 October 2019 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,302 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: <i>kprobes</i> can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while <i>kretprobes</i> are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API), implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program~~, or configured via debugfs or the [[perf]] tool~~.		Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: <i>kprobes</i> can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while <i>kretprobes</i> are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API, as done by SystemTap), manipulated via debugfs (as done by ftrace), configured using the [[perf]] tool, or implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program.

	uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, explicitly specified by kernel authors using <tt>TRACE_EVENT</tt>; think of them as "opt-in", as opposed to dynamic kprobes, though there is a tracepoint for each system call.		uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, explicitly specified by kernel authors using <tt>TRACE_EVENT</tt>; think of them as "opt-in", as opposed to dynamic kprobes, though there is a tracepoint for each system call.