Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!
Pages: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Hardware== | |||
* PAE, page tables, PTEs, TLB -- explain ''FIXME'' | |||
==Huge Pages== | ==Huge Pages== | ||
Making pages larger means fewer TLB misses for a given TLB size (due to more pages being supportable in the same amount of memory, due to narrower page identifiers), large mapping/releasing operations will be faster (due to fewer page table entries needing to be handled), and less memory is devoted to page table entries for a given amount of memory being indexed. The downside is possible wastage of main memory (due to pages not being used as completely). A 2002 paper from Navarro et al at Rice proposed transparent operating system support: "[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.3.2392 Transparent Operating System Support for Superpages]". FreeBSD and Solaris support large pages transparently, while applications must explicitly take advantage of them on Linux (through at least 2.6.30). | Making pages larger means fewer TLB misses for a given TLB size (due to more pages being supportable in the same amount of memory, due to narrower page identifiers), large mapping/releasing operations will be faster (due to fewer page table entries needing to be handled), and less memory is devoted to page table entries for a given amount of memory being indexed. The downside is possible wastage of main memory (due to pages not being used as completely). A 2002 paper from Navarro et al at Rice proposed transparent operating system support: "[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.3.2392 Transparent Operating System Support for Superpages]". FreeBSD and Solaris support large pages transparently, while applications must explicitly take advantage of them on Linux (through at least 2.6.30). |
Revision as of 05:43, 19 June 2009
Hardware
- PAE, page tables, PTEs, TLB -- explain FIXME
Huge Pages
Making pages larger means fewer TLB misses for a given TLB size (due to more pages being supportable in the same amount of memory, due to narrower page identifiers), large mapping/releasing operations will be faster (due to fewer page table entries needing to be handled), and less memory is devoted to page table entries for a given amount of memory being indexed. The downside is possible wastage of main memory (due to pages not being used as completely). A 2002 paper from Navarro et al at Rice proposed transparent operating system support: "Transparent Operating System Support for Superpages". FreeBSD and Solaris support large pages transparently, while applications must explicitly take advantage of them on Linux (through at least 2.6.30).
Linux
- They were a 2003 Kernel Summit topic, after seeing first introduction in Linux 2.5.36 (LinuxGazette primer article)
- Rohit Seth provided the first explicit large page support to applications as covered in this LWN article
- alloc_hugepages, free_hugepages, get_large_pages(2) and shared_large_pages(2) were present in kernels 2.5.36-2.5.54
- hugetlbfs and assorted infrastructure replaced these. Mel Gorman's Linux MM wiki has a good page on hugetlbfs.
- Val Henson wrote a good 2006 KHB article in LWN on transparent largepage support
Applications
- MySQL can use hugetlbfs via the large-pages option
- kvm can use hugetlbfs with the --mem-path option since kvm-62, released in late 2008
Page Clustering
Page clustering (implemented by William Lee Irwin for Linux in 2003, and not to be confused with page-granularity swap-out clustering). There's good coverage in this KernelTrap article. This is essentially huge pages without hardware support, and therefore with some overhead and no improvements in TLB-relative performance. It was written up in Irwin's 2003 OLS paper, "A 2.5 Page Clustering Implementation".