Kprobes

Line 1:

Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: <i>kprobes</i> can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while <i>kretprobes</i> are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API), implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program, or configured via debugfs or the [[perf]] tool.

uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, ~~but they are~~ specified by kernel authors, as opposed to dynamic kprobes.

uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, explicitly specified by kernel authors using <tt>TRACE_EVENT</tt>; think of them as "opt-in", as opposed to dynamic kprobes, though there is a tracepoint for each system call.

==Kernel configuration==

Kprobes: Difference between revisions

Dank (talk | contribs)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Kprobes use the breakpoint mechanism to dynamically instrument Linux kernel code. Two types exist: <i>kprobes</i> can be attached to all but a few blacklisted instruction ranges in a running kernel, while <i>kretprobes</i> are attached to a function and run when it returns. This instrumentation can be packaged as a kernel module (using the <tt>register_probe</tt> and <tt>unregister_probe</tt> kernel API), implemented as a <tt>BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE</tt>-type [[eBPF]] program, or configured via debugfs or the [[perf]] tool.
-uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, but they are specified by kernel authors, as opposed to dynamic kprobes.
+uprobes are the userspace equivalent of kprobes. jprobes are no longer a thing. i don't believe dprobes to be a thing anymore, either, but might be mistaken. tracepoints are places to hook the same kind of analysis, explicitly specified by kernel authors using <tt>TRACE_EVENT</tt>; think of them as "opt-in", as opposed to dynamic kprobes, though there is a tracepoint for each system call.
 ==Kernel configuration==