Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!

13 drives: Difference between revisions

From dankwiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxTol !! MinFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
|-
|-
| raid3z
| raid3z
Line 8: Line 8:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 100% + fail
| 100% + fail
|
|
Line 15: Line 16:
| 69.2% (9)
| 69.2% (9)
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 92.3%
| 92.3%
|  
|  
Line 22: Line 24:
| 84.6% (11)
| 84.6% (11)
| 2
| 2
| 3
| 84.6% + fail
| 84.6% + fail
|
|
Line 29: Line 32:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 2
| 2
| 3
| 76.9%
| 76.9%
|
|
Line 36: Line 40:
| 61.5% (8)
| 61.5% (8)
| 2 + 2
| 2 + 2
| 3
| 30.8%
| 30.8%
|
|
Line 43: Line 48:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 1 + 1
| 1 + 1
| 2
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
Line 50: Line 56:
| 61.5% (8)
| 61.5% (8)
| 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
| 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
| 2
| 25%
| 25%
|
|
Line 57: Line 64:
| 30.8% (4)
| 30.8% (4)
| 6 + 2
| 6 + 2
| 6
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
Line 64: Line 72:
| 38.5% (5)
| 38.5% (5)
| 6 + 1
| 6 + 1
| 4
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
Line 73: Line 82:


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxFail !! MinFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxTol !! MinFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
|-
|-
| raid3z
| raid3z
Line 119: Line 128:
| 28.6% (4)
| 28.6% (4)
| 7 + 3
| 7 + 3
| 4
| 8
| 50% + fail
| 50% + fail
|
|
Line 127: Line 136:
| 35.7% (5)
| 35.7% (5)
| 7 + 2
| 7 + 2
| 3
| 6
| 50% + fail
| 50% + fail
|
|
Line 135: Line 144:
| 42.9% (6)
| 42.9% (6)
| 7 + 1
| 7 + 1
| 2
| 4
| 50% + fail
| 50% + fail
|
|
|}
|}

Revision as of 12:10, 7 February 2022

What's the best setup for 13 drives? I don't need high performance (this will be mostly for archiving media), but very much do not want to lose my data. The drives are 18TB, and ZFS will be used exclusively.

Name Setup Availability MaxTol MinFail Max Rebuild Perf
raid3z 10 data, 3 parity 76.9% (10) 3 4 100% + fail
raid3z + HS 9 data, 3 parity, 1 spare 69.2% (9) 3 4 92.3%
raid2z 11 data, 2 parity 84.6% (11) 2 3 84.6% + fail
raid2z + HS 10 data, 2 parity, 1 spare 76.9% (10) 2 3 76.9%
striped raid2z + HS 2x(4 data, 2 parity), 1 spare 61.5% (8) 2 + 2 3 30.8%
striped raidz + HS 2x(5 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 76.9% (10) 1 + 1 2 46.2%
striped raidz + HS 4x(2 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 61.5% (8) 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 2 25%
mirrored raid2z + HS 2x(4 data, 2 parity), 1 spare 30.8% (4) 6 + 2 6 46.2%
mirrored raidz + HS 2x(5 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 38.5% (5) 6 + 1 4 46.2%

14 disks

14 disks might be more attractive. I only list solutions without a hot spare.

Name Setup Availability MaxTol MinFail Max Rebuild Perf
raid3z 11 data, 3 parity 78.6% (11) 3 4 100% + fail
raid2z 12 data, 2 parity 85.7% (12) 2 3 85.7% + fail
striped raid3z 2x(4 data, 3 parity) 57.1% (8) 3 + 3 4 50% + fail
striped raid2z 2x(5 data, 2 parity) 71.4% (10) 2 + 2 3 50% + fail
striped raidz 2x(6 data, 1 parity) 85.7% (12) 1 + 1 2 50% + fail
mirrored raid3z 2x(4 data, 3 parity) 28.6% (4) 7 + 3 8 50% + fail
mirrored raid2z 2x(5 data, 2 parity) 35.7% (5) 7 + 2 6 50% + fail
mirrored raidz 2x(6 data, 1 parity) 42.9% (6) 7 + 1 4 50% + fail