Check out my first novel, midnight's simulacra!

13 drives: Difference between revisions

From dankwiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What's the best setup for 13 drives? I don't need high performance (this will be mostly for archiving media), but very much do not want to lose my data. The drives are 18TB, and [[ZFS]] will be used exclusively.
What's the best setup for 13 drives? I don't need high performance (this will be mostly for archiving media), but very much do not want to lose my data. The drives are 18TB, and [[ZFS]] will be used exclusively.
<b>MinFail</b>: This many failures will kill the array in the worst case.<br>
<b>MaxTol</b>: This many failures can be tolerated in the best case.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxTol !! MinFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
|-
|-
| raid3z
| raid3z
Line 8: Line 11:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 100% + fail
| 100% + fail
|
|
Line 15: Line 19:
| 69.2% (9)
| 69.2% (9)
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 92.3%
| 92.3%
|  
|  
Line 22: Line 27:
| 84.6% (11)
| 84.6% (11)
| 2
| 2
| 3
| 84.6% + fail
| 84.6% + fail
|
|
Line 29: Line 35:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 2
| 2
| 3
| 76.9%
| 76.9%
|
|
Line 36: Line 43:
| 61.5% (8)
| 61.5% (8)
| 2 + 2
| 2 + 2
| 3
| 30.8%
| 30.8%
|
|
Line 43: Line 51:
| 76.9% (10)
| 76.9% (10)
| 1 + 1
| 1 + 1
| 2
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
Line 50: Line 59:
| 61.5% (8)
| 61.5% (8)
| 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
| 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
| 2
| 25%
| 25%
|
|
Line 57: Line 67:
| 30.8% (4)
| 30.8% (4)
| 6 + 2
| 6 + 2
| 6
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
Line 64: Line 75:
| 38.5% (5)
| 38.5% (5)
| 6 + 1
| 6 + 1
| 4
| 46.2%
| 46.2%
|
|
|}
|}


==14 disks==
14 disks might be more attractive; I work that out [[Schwarzgerat_III|over here]].
 
14 disks might be more attractive. I only list solutions without a hot spare.
 
{| class="wikitable"
! Name !! Setup !! Availability !! MaxFail !! MinFail !! Max Rebuild !! Perf
|-
| raid3z
| 11 data, 3 parity
| 78.6% (11)
| 3
| 4
| 100% + fail
|
|-
| raid2z
| 12 data, 2 parity
| 85.7% (12)
| 2
| 3
| 85.7% + fail
|
|-
| striped raid3z
| 2x(4 data, 3 parity)
| 57.1% (8)
| 3 + 3
| 4
| 50% + fail
|
|-
| striped raid2z
| 2x(5 data, 2 parity)
| 71.4% (10)
| 2 + 2
| 3
| 50% + fail
|
|-
| striped raidz
| 2x(6 data, 1 parity)
| 85.7% (12)
| 1 + 1
| 2
| 50% + fail
|
|-
| mirrored raid3z
| 2x(4 data, 3 parity)
| 28.6% (4)
| 7 + 3
| 4
| 50% + fail
|
|-
| mirrored raid2z
| 2x(5 data, 2 parity)
| 35.7% (5)
| 7 + 2
| 3
| 50% + fail
|
|-
| mirrored raidz
| 2x(6 data, 1 parity)
| 42.9% (6)
| 7 + 1
| 2
| 50% + fail
|
|}

Latest revision as of 21:15, 12 March 2022

What's the best setup for 13 drives? I don't need high performance (this will be mostly for archiving media), but very much do not want to lose my data. The drives are 18TB, and ZFS will be used exclusively.

MinFail: This many failures will kill the array in the worst case.
MaxTol: This many failures can be tolerated in the best case.

Name Setup Availability MaxTol MinFail Max Rebuild Perf
raid3z 10 data, 3 parity 76.9% (10) 3 4 100% + fail
raid3z + HS 9 data, 3 parity, 1 spare 69.2% (9) 3 4 92.3%
raid2z 11 data, 2 parity 84.6% (11) 2 3 84.6% + fail
raid2z + HS 10 data, 2 parity, 1 spare 76.9% (10) 2 3 76.9%
striped raid2z + HS 2x(4 data, 2 parity), 1 spare 61.5% (8) 2 + 2 3 30.8%
striped raidz + HS 2x(5 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 76.9% (10) 1 + 1 2 46.2%
striped raidz + HS 4x(2 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 61.5% (8) 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 2 25%
mirrored raid2z + HS 2x(4 data, 2 parity), 1 spare 30.8% (4) 6 + 2 6 46.2%
mirrored raidz + HS 2x(5 data, 1 parity), 1 spare 38.5% (5) 6 + 1 4 46.2%

14 disks might be more attractive; I work that out over here.