Xorg hell: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:12, 20 May 2010 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,302 edits →See Also ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:52, 12 October 2011 view source Dank (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 11,302 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:Xkcdx11.png\|right\|thumb\|XKCD weighs in, 2011-10-12]]
	Ahhh, XFree86/Xorg. What a steaming pile of FUBAR it's been. Things are rapidly getting better, though (unfortunately, the [[Linux framebuffer\|framebuffer]] kernel layer now seems to be rotting slightly -- there's no intention, from what I can tell, to support [[Intel 965]] for instance). I use [[Intel 965]] video extensively, and have for some time -- info within might only be applicable to that card, and of course all of this may vary based on your [[Debian]] setup.		Ahhh, XFree86/Xorg. What a steaming pile of FUBAR it's been. Things are rapidly getting better, though (unfortunately, the [[Linux framebuffer\|framebuffer]] kernel layer now seems to be rotting slightly -- there's no intention, from what I can tell, to support [[Intel 965]] for instance). I use [[Intel 965]] video extensively, and have for some time -- info within might only be applicable to that card, and of course all of this may vary based on your [[Debian]] setup.